Review: 2016 Ford Transit
This hard-working cargo van wins us over with an overwhelming number of options and an engine that’s delightfully overkill.
– Cleveland, Ohio
I usually drive a review car at least 250 miles; that’s a good distance to get to know one when we only have a week with each. I drove this 2016 Ford Transit a mere 83 miles, though. I was busy that week moving my family to a new house, so while 83 miles sounds like far fewer than what’s needed for a proper review, they were hard-working miles, and I spent just as much time loading and unloading this long-wheelbase, extended-length, high-roof cargo van as I did driving it.
What I learned is that a job reviewing cars comes in handy when you have specific tasks to accomplish, like moving your worldly belongings from point A to B in one trip. I also learned electricians, painters, and inspectors are more interested in talking about a cargo van in your driveway than the Corvette that was there a week before. Finally, I learned the cargo van segment, where the rear-wheel-drive Ford Transit and Mercedes-Benz Sprinter hold court, is incredibly competitive and every option is a decent choice. Which one you prefer will come down to the details.
Pros
- The Transit I drove was fitted with the van’s top engine: a biturbocharged 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 producing 310 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque (a less powerful V6 and a more fuel-efficient five-cylinder diesel are also available). It was my favorite part about driving the Transit because it moves this very big boy with ease; unladen it’s like a cherry red hot rod in the shape of a tiny house. With the van packed with boxes, its EcoBoost engine, which is far more boost than eco, barely noticed the added weight. The penalty came at the pump, where I experienced fuel economy in the low teens while driving these heavy loads across town on city streets.
- This is my first time trying Ford’s latest attempt at a next-gen infotainment system with Sync 3. It’s also the first time I can say Sync is a net positive to the experience of driving a vehicle. Ford played it super safe with Sync 3 in terms of the user interface design, but it went all out on processing power so the system responds faster than even Chrysler’s vaunted UConnect. Sure, its appearance is a little drab and lacking in color, but you can’t fault its ease of use and performance.
- If there’s any company that knows how to offer a single a vehicle in hundreds of configurations, it’s Ford. The company has been building F-150s this way for decades. The Transit is no different, offering two wheelbases, three lengths, and three roof heights to go along with three engines and your choice of cargo- or passenger-carrying configurations. And that’s before the upfitters get involved. If you need a very specific van for your small business, Ford can build you a Transit that meets your needs. The only thing it lacks is four-wheel drive, which Mercedes offers on the Sprinter.
Cons
- The small-business owners I spoke with, most of whom were driving Sprinters, said they preferred a Mercedes badge on the grille of their van to a blue oval. I asked if they feared it implied that their services were expensive, and they all said no, it rather implies they’re a successful, stable small business with a professional reputation. Fair enough, though a three-pointed star might not play well in regions where “Made in America” is more appealing to people than a German carmaker’s reputation for luxury. The Transit is built in Missouri, and while the Sprinter is currently imported from overseas, Mercedes-Benz just broke ground on a new factory in the U.S. to build them locally.
- Having loaded, unloaded, and driven the Transit for a week while at the same time checking out the upfitted Sprinters being driven by the small-business owners we hired during our move, I can say the Ford felt a little cheaper. Whether it was the gauge of the metal feeling a little thinner when you slammed the rear doors or the plastics not being quite as nice, I’m not sure. One area I can point to specifically, though, are the double hinges on the rear doors: the Ford’s look more delicate and I worried about them breaking, whereas the Sprinter’s are beefier and feel stronger.
Competitors
Photos: John Neff / Motor1.com
Gallery: 2016 Ford Transit 2500: Review
Ford Transit
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
5 Vehicles That Are Surprisingly Great For Camping
Fiat's $14,000 Topolino Is Finally Street Legal In The US (Within Reason)
Ford’s Strong Profits Show High Gas Prices Aren’t Keeping F-150 Buyers Away
A Used Porsche Cayenne Is A Lot Of SUV For The Money: Why Buy?
The 15 Best Movie Cars of All Time, Ranked
Mazda Is Quietly Killing One Of Its Most Unusual Engines
Man Buys 2026 Ford Truck. Then The Salesman Gives Him A Sneaky Offer Usually Reserved For People With Bad Credit