GlobalNCAP, el organismo internacional de seguridad que incluye a LatinNCAP, denunció los diferentes estándares de seguridad que tienen las pick-ups que Nissan vende en distintos países. Dos NP300 Frontier compradas en Europa y África fueron sometidas a un choque frontal.

Una era una NP300 Frontier (Generación D22) cero kilómetro, como se vende actualmente en Sudáfrica. La otra era una NP300 Frontier (Generación D23) con tres años de uso, pero configurada para el mercado europeo.

El choque frontal se realizó con las dos unidades circulando a 56 km/h. La Nissan comprada en África obtuvo una calificación de cero estrellas en protección de adultos y dos estrellas para niños. La unidad usada vendida en Europa logró cuatro estrellas.

“Queremos denunciar el doble estándar de Nissan. Queremos que el mundo sepa que Nissan está produciendo vehículos de calidad muy diferente en distintas partes del mundo. Queremos que esto se detenga y que dejen de vender autos cero estrellas”, declaró David Ward, CEO de GlobalNCAP.

El video completo de la prueba y el comunicado oficial de GlobalNCAP se pueden ver acá abajo.

Esta no es la primera vez que GlobalNCAP denuncia el doble estándar en seguridad de Nissan. En octubre de 2016 se realizó un choque frontal entre un Versa y un Tsuru, con similares resultados (ver nota).

***

VIDEO: GlobalNCAP – Nissan vs. Nissan

***

Comunicado de prensa de GlobalNCAP Global NCAP Car To Car Crash Test Demonstrates Double Standard On Vehicle Safety In Africa

In the first test of its kind, Global NCAP has crashed the best-selling pick up model in Africa, the 2019 Nissan NP300 Hardbody, into a second-hand Nissan Navara NP300 manufactured in Europe in 2015. The unique car to car crash test graphically demonstrates the double standard currently applied by Nissan and other car makers to vehicle safety in Africa.

The difference in safety performance between the new African model and the second-hand European version is a matter of life and death. The crash test driver dummy in the new African Nissan would have likely sustained fatal injuries, the driver of the equivalent second-hand European model would have likely walked away from the crash. The second-hand European car is fitted with the life saving crash avoidance anti-skid system, Electronic Stability Control (ESC), the new African version is not.

Launched to coincide with this week’s Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety in Sweden, both of the crashed vehicles will be on public display as part of the ‘People’s Exhibition’ in Stockholm Central Railway Station. Global NCAP is partnering with the Global NGO Alliance for Road Safety in hosting the exhibition. The call to action from the #50by30 themed display will be the adoption of a new target to halve road deaths and serious injuries by 2030 by governments worldwide.

David Ward CEO and President of Global NCAP said: “This is a very dramatic car to car crash test which uniquely illustrates the double standard in vehicle safety performance between models sold in Europe and those sold in Africa. “The difference in crashworthiness is extraordinary. The new Nissan Hardbody performs significantly worse than the second-hand Nissan Navara, to the extent that the driver in the new African Nissan would likely have died from their injuries but the driver from the second-hand European Nissan would have walked away. “A new car in Africa is not necessarily a safer car. Second-hand imported cars from regions with tougher regulatory requirements for safety, and environmental performance, can offer consumers much greater protection. Our aim in publishing this crash test result to coincide with the Global Ministerial Conference in Sweden is very clear. As we approach the end of the first UN Decade of Action for Road Safety, and set an agenda for the next ten years, the double standard demonstrated by an auto manufacturer such as Nissan with the NP300 in Africa is utterly unacceptable.”

Saul Billingsley, Executive Director of the FIA Foundation said: “Does Nissan believe an African life is worth less than a European life? If not, how does the company explain the shocking safety gap between these two vehicles demonstrated by Global NCAP. If we are to meet the 2030 target of halving road deaths we must stamp out this kind of unethical behaviour by some in the car industry.

Willem Groenewald, CEO of the AA said: “These results are extremely worrying and point to a major deficiency in the quality of vehicles available in Africa. We have for a long time been concerned that vehicles available in Africa are inferior to those in other markets such as Europe and Asia, and these results seem to confirm that concern. What this car to car crash also demonstrates is a complete disdain for African vehicle consumers and their safety at the expense of profit. It also again highlights the need for stricter regulation of standards and tougher controls in terms of allowing these inferior vehicles on to African roads. On a final note, we endorse David’s sentiments that higher safety-rated second-hand vehicles are a better option than lower-rated new vehicles, especially in light of these poor results which clearly show the devastating impact on families and society of inferior models which are sold in Africa.”

The Nissan NP300 was previously tested by Global NCAP in 2018 as part of the #SaferCarsForAfrica campaign and received a zero star safety rating. The vehicle structure collapsed and was found to be unstable during the test. The high forces placed on the crash test driver dummy pose a significant risk of fatal injury. The NP300’s bodyshell was so unstable that the airbags were ineffective.

The Nissan Navara NP300 was previously tested by Euro NCAP in 2015 and achieved a four star adult occupant rating.

***

Frontier vs. Frontier: GlobalNCAP denunció diferencias en seguridad entre las pick-ups que vende Nissan